Bibliography
From OnSET
Click here to return to the OnSET homepage
Anderson, H.M., Cain, J., & Bird, E. (2005). Online student course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69(1), 34-43.
Avery, R. J., Bryant, W. K., Mathios, A., Kang, H. & Bell, D. (2006). Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations? Journal of Electronic Education. 37(1), 21-38.
Bai, L. & Biswas, S. (2004, June 20-23). Online course evaluation and analysis. Paper presented at the ASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, Engineering Researches New Heights, 10627-10637.
Ballantyne, C. (1999). Improving University Teaching: Responding to Feedback from Students. In N., Zepke, M., Knight, L., Leach, and A.,Viskovic, (Eds.), Adult Learning Cultures: Challenges and Choices in Times of Change. Wellington, Australia: WP Press, pp. 155--165.
Ballantyne, C. (2000, November). Why survey online: A practical look at issues in the use of the internet for surveys in higher education. A paper presented at the annual conferences of the American Evaluation Association, Honolulu, HI From Murdoch University. Discusses issues, advantages, exclusive approach, and buy-in of online surveys.
Ballantyne, C. (2003). Online evaluations of teaching: An examination of current practice and considerations for the future. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(103-112). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ballantyne, C. S. (2004, October 13-15). Online or on paper: An examination of the differences in response and respondents to a survey administered in two modes. Paper presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society Annual Conference, Adelaide, South Australia, Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.aes.asn.au/conferences/2004/FR21-Ballantyne,%20C.pdf .
Baum, P., Chapman, K. S., Dommeyer, C. J. & Hanna, R. W. (2001). Online versus in-class student evaluations of faculty. Paper presented at the Hawaii Conference on Business, Honolulu, HI.
Bothell, T. W. & Henderson, T. (2003). Do online ratings of instruction make $ense? In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(69-79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bullock, C. D. (2003). Online collection of midterm student feedback. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(95-102). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cantera, L. (2002). Y puts teacher evaluations online. Retrieved on August 26, 2003, from http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/41005 NewsNet. Brigham Young University, Provo:UT.
Carini, R.M., Hayek,J.C., Kuh, G.D., & Ouimet, J.A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1-19. Retrieved September 17, 2003, from http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/0361-0365/contents .
Cates, W. M. (1993). A small-scale comparison of the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of student end-of-course evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 401-409.
Chang, T. S. (2003, April 21-25). The results of student ratings: The comparison between paper and online survey. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Chang, T. S., (2005). The validity and reliability of student ratings: Comparison between paper-pencil and online survey. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47(2), pp. 113-125.
Clark, S. J., Reiner, C.M., & Johnson, T.D. (2005). Online course-ratings and the personnel evaluation standards. In D.D. Williams, M. Hricko, & S.L. Howell (Eds.), Online Assessment, Measurement, and Evaluation: Emerging Practices, Volume III (61-75). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Clayson, D.E. (2007). Conceptual and statistical problems of using between-class data in education research. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(1), 34-38.
Cody, A. (1999). Evaluation via the web. Teaching and Education News, 9(6). University of Queensland. Retrieved September 17, 2003, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/TEN/TEN_previous/TEN4_99/index.html.
Collings, D. & Ballantyne, C. S. (2004, November 24-25). Online student survey comments: A qualitative improvement? Paper presented at the 2004 Evaluation Forum, Melbourne, Victoria.. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/pubs/docs/Eval_forum_paper.pdf .
Cummings, R., Ballantyne, C., & Fowler, L. (2001). Online student feedback surveys: Encouraging staff and student use. In E. Santhanam (Ed.), Proceedings of Teaching Evaluation Forum. Student Feedback on Teaching: Reflections and projections (pp. 29-37) Crawley: University of Western Australia. Retrieved March 28, 2003, from http://www.csd.uwa.edu.au/spot/forum_monograph.pdf .
Cummings, R. & Ballantyne, C. (1999). Student feedback on teaching: Online! On target? Paper presented at the Australasian society annual conference, Perth, Western Australia, October 6-8. Retrieved September 23, 2002, from http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/pubs/docs/AES_1999_Conference_Final.rtf.
Dillman, D., Tortora, R., Conradt, J., & Bowker, D. (1998). Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for web surveys, Retrieved April 4, 2007, from http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/asa98ppr.pdf.
Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Chapman, K. S. & Hanna, R. W. (2003, November 22-25). An experimental investigation of student response rates to faculty evaluations: The effect of the online method and online treatments. Paper presented at the Decision Sciences Institute, Washington, DC. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/dsi/2003/procs/4517916.pdf
Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P. & Hanna, R. W. (2002). College students' attitudes toward methods of collecting teaching evaluation: In-class versus on-line (electronic version). Journal of Education for Business, 78(1), 11-15.
Dommeyer, C.J., Baum, P., Hanna, R.W., Chapman, (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 611-623.
Donovan, J., Mader, C. & Shinsky, J. (2006, Winter). Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDr/5.35.pdf.
Fraze, S., Hardin, K., Brashears, T., Smith, J. & Lockaby, J. (2002, December 11-13). The effects of delivery mode upon survey response rate and perceived attitudes of Texas Agri-Science teachers. Paper presented at the National Agricultural Education Research Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Gamliel, E. & Davidovitz, L. (2005). Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: Mode can matter, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Routledge, part of the Taylor and Francis Group, 30(6).
Goodman, A. & Campbell, M. (1999). Developing appropriate administrative support for online teaching with an online unit evaluation system, Advances in Multi-media and Distance Education, (17-22). International Institute for Advanced Studies, Windsor, Retrieved online May 4, 2007, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/~agoodman/publications/isimade99.pdf.
Grinnell, L. D., Carey, L. M. & White, J. A. (1999, November). Modifying end-of-course student ratings for distance and web-enhanced courses: Do students discriminate among content, delivery, and infrastructure support? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association.
Ha, T. S. & Marsh, J. (1998, May). A web-based system for teaching evaluation. Paper presented at the NCITT'98 30th Anniversary Conference, Lingnam College, Hong Kong.
Ha, T.S., & Mars, J. Using the web for student evaluation of teaching (COSSET and OSTEI). Retrieved March 28, 2003, from http://home.ust.hk/~eteval/cosset/qtlconf.pdf.
Handwerk, P., Carson, C. & Blackwell, K. (2000, May). On-line vs. paper-and-pencil surveying of students: A case study. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Institutional Research.
Hardy, N. (2003). Online ratings: Fact and fiction. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(31-38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Heines, J. M. (2005). A comparison of free-form student evaluations on RateMyProfessors.com and a university-based system. Submitted to the SIGCSE 2006 Symposium, Houston, TX, 2006.
Heines, J. M. & Martin, D. (2005, May 26-28). Development and deployment of a web-based course evaluation system: Trying to satisfy the faculty, the students, the administration, and the Union. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WebIST), Miami, FL. Retrieved May 4, 2007, from http://teaching.cs.uml.edu/~heines/academic/papers/2005webist/WebIST2005-JH-DM.pdf.
Helgeson, J. G. & Ursic, M. L. (1989). The decision process equivalency of electronic versus pencil and paper data collection methods. Social Science Computer Review, 7(3), 296-310.
Henderson, T. (2001). Classroom assessment techniques in asynchronous learning networks. Technology Source. Retrieved August 26, 2005, from http://technologysource.org/article/classroom_assessment_techniques_in_asynchronous_learning_networks/.
Hernández, L. O., Wetherby, K. & Pegah, M., (2004). Dancing with the devil: Faculty assessment process transformed with web technology. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services, Baltimore, MD, 60-64.
Hmieleski, K. Barriers to online evaluation: Surveying the nation's top 200 most wired colleges. (2000). Unpublished report. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Troy, NY.
Hmieleski, K. H. & Champagne, M. (2000, September/October). Plugging in to course evaluation. The Technology Source, Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=795).
Hoffman, K. M. (2003). Online course evaluation and reporting in higher education. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96 (25-29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, T.D. (2001, September). Online student ratings: Research and possibilities. Invited plenary at the Online Assessment Conference, Champaign, IL.
Johnson, T. D. (2003). Online student ratings: Will students respond? In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(49-59). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, T. D. & Sorenson, D. L. (Eds.) (2003). New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kasiar, J. B., Schroeder, S. L. & Holstad, S. G. (2001). Comparison of traditional and web-based course evaluation processes in a required, team-taught pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 63, 268-70.
Kelly, M. & Marsh, J. (1999). Going online with student evaluation of teaching. Evaluation of the Student Experience Project, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
Klassen, K. J. & Smith, W. (2002). From atoms to bits: Using web-logs to understand on-line instructor evaluations. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Decision Sciences Institution, 1222-1227.
Krajewski, S. & Pike, D. (2005, April 1-3). Augsburg college student evaluation of courses; Kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Paper presented at the Conference on Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the Liberal Arts Colleges, Northfield Minnesota. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.augsburg.edu/ctl/stueval.pdf .
Kuhtman, M. (2004). Review of online student ratings of instruction. College and University Journal, 80(1), 64-67.
Laubsch, P. (2006). Online and in-person evaluations: A literature review and exploratory comparison. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(2).
Layne, B.H., DeCristoforo, J.R., & McGinty, D. (1999). Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 221-232.
Leibowitz, W. R. (1999). Web sites offer evaluations of professors, for better or worse. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Information Technology.
Liu, Y. (2006). A comparison study of online versus traditional student evaluation of instruction. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 3(4).
Llewellyn, D.C. (2003). Online reporting of results of online student ratings. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(61-68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Matz, C. M. (1999). Administration of web versus paper surveys: Mode effects and response rates. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 439 694).
Mayer, J., and George, A. (2003, May). The university of Idaho's online course evaluation system: Going forward! Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Tampa, FL.
McCormack, C., Applebee, A., & Donnan, P. (2003, July/August). Opening a can of worms: A conversation about the ethics of online student evaluation of teaching. The Technology Source. Retrieved August 18, 2003, from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=1006.
McCollum, M., Cyr, T., Criner, T. M., Jarvis, C., Paulsen, S., Tate, G. & Altiere, R. J. (2003). Implementation of a web-based system for obtaining curricular assessment data. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67, 1-3.
McGhee, D. E. & Lowell, N. (2003). Psychometric properties of student ratings of instruction in online and on-campus courses. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(39-48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McGourty, J., Scoles, K. & Thorpe, S. (2002, June). Web-based student evaluation of instruction: Promises and pitfalls. 42nd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, CA. Retrieved March 21, 2003, from http://www.drexel.edu/provost/ir/conf/webeval.pdf.
McGourty, J., Scoles, K. & Thorpe, S. (2002, November). Web-based student evaluation: comparing the experience at two universities. Paper presented at the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved March 21, 2003, from http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2002/papers/1328.pdf.
Measurement and evaluation Q&A. (2001, Fall). Measurement and Evaluation Newsletter, 8(1), 1. From the University of Illinois , questions and answers regarding the Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) and Evaluation Online (EON).
Monsen, S., Woo, W., Mahan, C. & Miller, G. W. (2005). Online course evaluations: Lessons learned. Presentation at the CALI Conference for Law School Computing.
Nair, C. S., Wayland, C. & Soediro, S. (2005, November 28-29). Evaluating the student experience: A leap into the future. Paper presented at the 2005 Evaluation Forum, Sydney, Australia, 25-32.
Norris, J. & Conn, C. (2005). Investigating strategies for increasing student response rates to online delivered course evaluations. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 13-32.
Nulty, D. (2001, August). Web on-line feedback (WOLF): Intentions and evaluation. In E. Santhanam (Ed.), Proceedings of the Teaching Evaluation Forum: Vol. Student Feedback on Teaching: Reflections and Projections. (38-41). Crawley: University of Western Australia. Retrieved November 11, 2003, from http://www.csd.uwa.edu.au/spot/forum/forum_monograph.pdf.
Oliver, B., Tucker, B., Ballantyne, C. & Collings, D. (2005, November 28). Moving student evaluation of teaching online: Reporting pilot outcomes and issues with a focus on how to increase student response rates. Paper presented at the 2005 Evaluation Forum, Sydney, Australia, 88.
Oliver, R. L. & Sautter, E. P. (2005). Using course management systems to enhance the value of student evaluations for teaching. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 231-5.
Pougatchev, V., George, N., Lue, G. & Williams, R. (2006). Developing an on-line course/instructor evaluation system. Proceedings of the 5th IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, 57-60.
Ravelli, B. (2000, June 14-18). Anonymous online teaching assessments: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the AAHE's Assessment Conference 2000. Charlotte, NC. Retrieved March 28, 2003, from http://www.edrs.com/DocLibrary/0201/ED445069.pdf. Mount Royal College, Calgary.
Rigsby, B. & Smith, C. (2000, December). Evaluation using the anonymous feedback system. Teaching and Educational Development Institute, University of Queensland. Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/TEN/TEN_previous/TEN4_99/ten4_Rigsby.
Robinson, P., White, J. & Denman, D.W. (2004). Course evaluations online: Putting a structure into place. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services, Baltimore, MD, 52-55.
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K. & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432.
Schaefer, D. R. & Dillman, D. A. (1998). Development of a standard e-mail methodology: Results of an experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(3). 378-397.
Schawitch, M. (2005, June). Online course evaluations: One institute’s success in transitioning from a paper process to a completely electronic process! Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Forum.
Scoles, K., Bilgutay, N. & Good, J. (2000). A new course evaluation process. IEEE transactions on education, 43(2), 125-131.
Sorenson, D. L. & Reiner, C. (2003). Charting the uncharted seas of online student ratings of instruction. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(1-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Synodinos, N. E., Papacostas, C. S. & Okimoto, G. M. (1994). Computer administered versus paper-and-pencil surveys and the effect of sample selection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 26(4), 395-401.
Theall, M. (2000, November/December). Electronic course evaluation is not necessarily the solution. The Technology Source. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from http://technologysource.org/article/electronic_course_evaluation_is_not_necessarily_the_solution/.
Theall, M. & Franklin, J. L. (1990). Student ratings in the context of complex evaluation systems. In M. Theall & J. L. Franklin (Eds.). Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice: New directions for teaching and learning, 43(17-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Theall, M. & Franklin, J. L. (2000). Creating responsive student ratings systems to improve evaluation practice. In K. E. Ryan (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning: Evaluating teaching in higher education. 83(95-107). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Theall, M. & Franklin, J. L. (2001). Using technology to facilitate evaluation. In C. Knapper & P. Cranton (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Fresh approaches to the evaluation of teaching. 88(41-50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thorpe, S. W. (2002, June). Online student evaluation of instruction: An investigation of non response bias. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ERIC Document No. ED472469.
Tomsic, M., Hendel, D. & Matross, R. (2000, May). A world wide web response to student satisfaction surveys: Comparisons using paper and internet formats. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Institutional Research.
Tucker, B., Jones, S., Straker, L. & Cole, J. (2003). Course evaluation on the web: Facilitating student and teacher reflection to improve learning. In T. D. Johnson & D. L. Sorenson (Eds.), New directions for teaching and learning: Online student ratings of instruction, 96(81-93). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Underwood, D., Kim, H. & Matier, M. (2000, May). To mail or to web: Comparisons of survey response rates and respondent characteristics. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Institutional Research.
Woodward, D. K. (1998). Comparison of course evaluations by traditional and computerized on line methods. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62, 90S.
